Saturday, November 28, 2009

Book News Notice

Due to the Thanksgiving holiday (and therefore a short news week), LND's Book News Round-Up is taking a break this week. I'll be back on Monday (or Tuesday, if I have to play catch up at work) with more reading goodness for LND.

Besides, I'm spending my Thanksgiving holiday weekend reading a lot of books, so really, it's all for you.

Happy Holidays!

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Giving Literary Thanks


Last year, I celebrated Thanksgiving on this blog by imagining what a Turkey Day dinner might be like for some of the best-known dysfunctional families in literature. While that remains one of my most favorite posts, I thought I’d try a different tact this year.

This year, in honor of Thanksgivings, I decided to make a list of all the literary things for which I’m thankful: the authors, books and people who have helped shape my love of all things literary.

Without further adieu:

  • My parents (obviously) for keeping my home filled with books and stories from the very beginning and for indulging me when I asked for more books;
  • My first-grade teacher, for teaching me to read (I still remember her using my name – Meredith – during the lesson on “th” sounds);
  • My English professors in college: Dr. Erler, Dr. Pitchford and Dr. Suarez, for making me a better reader and a better writer and for reminding me again and again why I loved words;
  • My friend Lindsay, for starting the book club I’m currently a part of, because without it, I probably would drive people crazy;
  • William Shakespeare, for writing some of the greatest words – and stories – the English language has ever seen;
  • Jane Austen, for letting me fall in love with Mr. Darcy and Captain Wentworth at least once a year;
  • J.R.R. Tolkien, for being the foundation upon which so many of my favorite science-fiction and fantasy novels are built;
  • Anne Shirley and Jo March, for being as real to me as everyone else in the world;
  • The U.K. Parliament and the Public Libraries Act of 1850, recognized for being the beginning of the modern, free, open access library;
  • The American Library Association, for doing the same in the United States;
  • Amazon.com, for pioneering the online bookstore and feeding my book habit; and
  • The graduate school assignment that led me to create this blog in the first place. I didn’t know what I was starting a year ago, but I’m sure glad I stuck around to find out.
[Photo Credit: Google Image Search ]

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Book News Round-Up

Time flies, bookworms! I can't believe Thanksgiving is practically upon us. As you ponder which pie you're going to eat first, sit back and enjoy this week's book news.

  • Twilight inspires a lot of emotion - you either love it or hate it. So Galley Cat decided to see what some "literary" authors thought about the popular series. While most might expect a snobbish response (e.g, "Twilight's not real literature"), the reactions were actually quite mature. Most of the respondents said that while they may not like the series themselves, they were thrilled with anything that gets kids to read. And to that, I say "amen!"
  • For those intrepid writers participating in NaNoWriMo, the Inkwell Bookstore Blog has some helpful suggestions from famous authors and the like. My personal favorite, that made me literally laugh aloud: @JesusHChrist: Have half ur book B backstory/prologue. Then have the main novel told from p.o.v. of several different people. Kill off a few characters, resurrect some, add an epilogue, hint at a sequel. God-humor always works.
  • It's official - Facebook has officially infiltrated the last reaches of all respectable society. The New Oxford American Dictionary announced its Word of the Year for 2009: "unfriend." Ironically enough, I have no words to express my simultaneous laughter and horror.
  • While New Moon undoubtedly stormed the box office this weekend, another page-to-screen adaptation has been quietly raking in the money and the critical acclaim. The indie movie, Precious, based on a novel by Sapphire, has yet to receive anything but glowing praise for it's screenplay and actors. Of course, it probably helps that Oprah helped finance it. Oprah's like the King Midas of the 21st century.
  • Somebody's got a case of Catholic guilt! Thanks to the Inkwell Bookstore Blog, I came across this article about overdue library books being returned - 51 years later! The anonymous patron included the two late books, a note of apology and $1,000 for the overdue fees. Which, of course, makes me feel incredibly guilty about that Richard Scarry book I never returned to my own local library. *Gulp.*
  • School Library Journal has a great interview with Neil Gaiman. That man can do no wrong in my mind. He talks about the difference between writing for adults and writing for children, coming out with a great and inspired quote: "If you write well for kids, you may be changing lives, in a way you probably aren’t for adults... for children you’re giving them part of what made them. The man's a genius.
  • Thanks to Twitter, I came across the best review ever of Sarah Palin's new book. When the review started with "Going Rogue is shit," I knew I was going to like it.
  • Well, there goes the publishing world. Oprah announced this week that her eponymous talk show will end in September 2011 and with it, the ever-pervasive Oprah Book Club. Though the club hasn't had the same level of impact in recent years as it did at it's peak, the Oprah seal of approval still manages to sell quite a few books. It will interested to see how this affects book sales in the coming years. Of course, it might be nice to let someone else do the recommending.
  • Sorry, haters, but it looks as if Twilight is here to stay. In a new interview in Time magazine, Twilight (the movie) director Catherine Hardwicke talks about the lasting appeal of the series and opines that the Twilight phenomenon will be sticking around for quite awhile.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Saturday, November 21, 2009

New Moon: The Movie


If it wasn't abundantly obvious by now, I'm definitely a Twilight fan. So, bookworms, you've been warned. This is a post about Twilight. And if you're a Twilight hater, well... you probably stopped reading this blog awhile ago.

Last night, my friend L and I went to a late night showing of the New Moon movie because while we look like adults on the outside, we're really just 13-year-old girls on the inside. I had high hopes for this movie. As much as I liked the Twilight movie (and I did), it wasn't as great as I thought it could be. I had a sneaking suspicion that New Moon might surpass Twilight.

I'm happy to report that I wasn't disappointed. The New Moon movie is a much stronger adaptation of Stephenie Meyer's book that the first movie was. Though both movies stick fairly close to the original novels, the New Moon adaptation shows that both screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg and the cast have grown into the roles. While staying true to the story, New Moon also managed to stand on its own as a movie worthy in its own right. And the direct-from-the-book dialogue was cut down a bit, which helped.

One of the things I loved best about this movie was how much more visual it was. When I read (and re-read) the Twilight books, it's always a visual experience for me. As I'm reading the words on the page, I can visually see the story taking place in my head. New Moon the movie captured this feeling really well and translated the pages of words into a visually impressive story. The Volturi scenes, in particular, were pretty spectacular.

Adapting beloved novels for the screen is always a tricky business, even when fans are all but guaranteed to see the film. Much like the Harry Potter movies needed to find their stride, I think the Twilight series of movies are starting to come together in a great way.

So if you're a Twilight fan, this might be the only time I actually advocate movies over books. Stop reading this blog and go to the movies! (Well, read the New Moon book first, then see the movie!)

[Photo Credit: Stephenie Meyer's website]

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Thursday, November 19, 2009

National Book Awards


Yesterday, the National Book Foundation hosted the 60th National Book Awards benefit dinner and ceremony in New York City. Four authors (one each in the following categories: fiction, nonfiction, poetry and young people’s literature) were honored with a National Book Award, one of the three most prestigious book awards an American authors can win.

The big winner of the night was Colum McCann in the Fiction category for his novel, Let the Great World Spin. McCann's novel takes the real-life exploits of Philippe Petit (who walked on a tightrope between the Twin Towers in 1974) and centers an ensemble of stories around this event. Amazon.com named it Best of the Month in June 2009. (For reasons I’ve never quite understood, the “big winner” is always the fiction winner, which somehow implies that the nonfiction, poetry and YA authors aren’t as good. But I digress). The other awards were given to: The First Tycoon: The Epic Life of Cornelius Vanderbilt by T.J. Stiles (nonfiction); Transcendental Studies: A Trilogy by Keith Waldrop (poetry); and Claudette Colvin: Twice Toward Justice by Phillip Hoose (young people's literature).

Since 2009 marked the 60th anniversary of the NBA’s, the National Book Foundation asked the public to vote for the Best of the NBA Fiction (what did I tell about fiction hogging the spotlight?). After writers from across the country narrowed down the previous fiction winners to six finalists, every average Joe and Jane was encouraged to vote for their pick online. After a month of voting, America (or at least the literate, literary-aware portion of America) spoke: the best National Book Award fiction book is Flannery O'Connor's Complete Stories.

The awards ceremony also featured special awards: Gore Vidal was honored for his Distinguished Contribution to American Letters and Dave Eggers received the Literarian Award for Outstanding Service to the American Literary Community.

The National Book Awards are presented annually to American authors for literature published in the previous year. Along with the National Book Critics Circle Awards and the Pulitzer Prize for Literature, the NBA is one of the three most prestigious book awards given to American authors.

[Photo Credit: National Book Foundation]

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Monday, November 16, 2009

Literary Guilty Pleasures


Shhhh! If you promise not to tell, I'll let you in on a little literary secret. You promise?

Okay......

I love romance novels. They are my literary guilty pleasure. Now, I'm not talking about books by Nora Roberts or Debbie Macomber (though I do have quite a few of those on my shelves as well). No, I'm talking about the Harlequin books, the ones you get for $5 at the grocery store or Target.

There are the number of different imprints under the Harlequin name, but I'm partial to Silhouette Desire and Silhouette Special Edition books. They have ridiculously outrageous titles like Ruthless Billionaire, Forbidden Baby and Marrying the Virgin Nanny. The men are almost always impossibly handsome, independently wealthy, arrogant, demanding, and stubborn. The women are beautiful and lonely, just waiting for some nice man to come along and save them from a life of dreariness. The men want sex; the women want love. And in just a few short chapters, usually after a few minor mishaps and misunderstandings along the way, they all live happily ever after.

These are not "literary" books by any means. The publishers churn out multiple titles a month and while many authors return again and again (often times writing a series of books with cross-over characters), none of the names are well-known outside of the romance novel world. I've even found grammatical typos in a few books, which probably points to harried editors. These books are fluff, pure and simple. But they are absolutely irresistible fluff.

Sometimes, I don't want to focus on plotlines or character development. Sometimes, I just want to read. I don't want anything complicated or strenuous. I just want to get lost in someone else's life - however unrealistic - for awhile. That's when I read the Harlequin books. I read a lot and these romance novels are not the staple of my reading diet, by any means. But just like any other diet, sometimes you need a sweet treat.

What about you, bookworms? What's your literary guilty pleasure?

[Photo Credit: eHarlequin.com]

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Book News Round-Up

Happy Saturday, bookworms! I'm making a point of relaxing today with a massage and a pedicure. Hey, a girl cannot live on books alone (though she can try!). Here's this week's book news:

  • Once upon a time, schools taught us how to read and write. But according to Copy Blogger, there are 7 deadly writing sins we commit from time to time and they’re all courtesy of old school lessons. Among the admonishments: paragraphs do not, in fact, need to be at least five sentences long and being objective isn’t as fun as having an opinion.
  • Been holding out on buying a Kindle? Maybe it’s because it was too….small? Amazon recently announced the rollout of Kindle for PC, a free downloadable program that lets you read Kindle books on your PC (with promises of a Mac version soon). You still have to pay for the Kindle books, of course, but now you can lug your books around on your laptop!
  • Of all the story anthologies published, Best American Short Stories is probably the only one I’ve ever read. And, according to The Millions blog, it’s also the most popular. The writers and editors over at The Millions took a look at some of the numbers and found that Alice Munro, who is not actually American (but – gasp! – Canadian) has been the author featured the most over the past 30 years. Thereby proving that the best Americans (Michael J. Fox, Alex Trebek) are really from the north.
  • Narrative Magazine is hosting a Fall 2009 story contest. Entrants can write short stories, essays, memoirs, and excerpts from longer pieces of fiction and nonfiction. Entries can’t have been published before and must adhere to the 15,000 word limit. The submission deadline is November 1st. For more information, click on that helpful link I added above. (I’m not just a pretty face, folks!)
  • Three cheers for rebellion! She Writes, a community for women writers, is encouraging members and other readers to boycott the Publisher’s Weekly Best 10 Books of 2009 list because it did not include any female authors. They ask people to post a response to Publisher’s Weekly outlining their disappointment, buy a book by a female author and share posts with other readers. I’m all for subversive-ness, but since there’s still 90 other books on the PW list, is all the outrage really necessary?
  • Warning to parents: sometimes teenagers do stupid things. Cory Doctorow wrote a great – and thoughtful – article about the sex and drinking in his best-selling novel, Little Brother. (That the parents worried about the sex missed all of the stuff on how to overthrow a government – well, that worries me.) Doctorow defends his choice as an author, pointing out (quite rightly) that real teens drink and have sex. To omit such common occurrences from a novel about teens would be silly. File his essay under “more reasons why I think Cory Doctorow rocks.”
  • Speaking of the man himself, he’ll be at the Harvard Book Store in Cambridge on Monday (the 16th) at 7pm to do a reading and sign books. If politics is more your speed, David Plouffe, President Obama’s campaign manager, will be talking about his new book, The Audacity to Win at First Parish Church in Cambridge on Wednesday (the 18th). The Plouffe reading requires $5 tickets, available from Harvard.com or the Harvard Book Store.
  • Last, but certainly not least, I'm famous!

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Friday, November 13, 2009

National Novel Writing Month


Every November, writers of all shapes and sizes embark on a journey to do what every writer dreams about: write a novel.

National Novel Writing Month (or NaNoWriMo) isn’t exactly a contest, but rather a challenge – one that values enthusiasm, determination and perseverance. Starting on November 1st, participants attempt to write a 175-page (50,000-word) novel by midnight, November 30. Understandably, the focus here is on quantity, not quality. Books can always be edited and revised once written. The point of NaNoWriMo is to do the hard part – getting the words out of your head and onto the page or screen.

The brilliance of NaNoWriMo lies in the fact that anyone – literally anyone – can participate. Doctors, teachers, lawyers, construction workers, students, grandparents – all have undertaken the challenge to write a book in a month. The NaNoWriMo website offers forums and message boards to support participants as they set out on their writing adventure. When you sign up, you also have access to a word count scoreboard to help you keep track of your goals.

For a challenge that started in 1999 with just 21 writers and six winners (those individuals who managed to reach the desired word count in the allotted time), these days, NaNoWriMo is well-known throughout the blogosphere. Last year, nearly 120,000 people took to their computers to write and more than 20,000 people succeeded.

A skeptic might have doubts about the effectiveness of writing a novel in just 30 days. Remember, of course, that J.K. Rowling often had years between her Harry Potter books – though in fairness, her books did exceed the 50,000 word count by quite a lot. Still, more than 35 NaNoWriMo novels have been published, including Sara Gruen’s NY Times #1 best-seller, Water for Elephants.

As this current cycle in underway, the fruits of this year’s labor remain to be seen. But I’ll be interested to see the results. And who knows? Maybe next I’ll even participate myself.

[Photo Credit: Office of Letters and Light]

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Choice vs. Requirement


Each year, every child shudders at the thought of hearing two dreaded words: required reading. Unfortunately for them, nearly every school requires students in any grade to read the same book as their classmates and participate in classroom discussions.

But some teachers are moving away from that approach. An article in the New York Times explores the idea of reading workshops in classrooms. Instead of requiring specific books, teachers are allowing students to choose whatever they want to read.

There are obviously proponents and critics of this trend. Critics argue that required reading gives students a "shared literary culture" and provides a strong literary foundation, rooted in classic literature. But proponents of the reading workshop point out that some students struggle with required reading, either because of their reading ability or because they don't like the book. The risk, proponents say, is of children developing a distaste for reading when they should be learning to love it.

The article hit a nerve in the education/literary blogosphere, with teachers, parents, librarians and authors chiming in with their two cents. Popular YA author Meg Cabot argues against mandatory reading on her blog, using her own adolescence as an example:

I cannot think of a single book I enjoyed that I was required to read in school...But I still remember and love all the books I discovered on my own, or that librarians or my parents or friends or teachers recommended to me. I think the classics should be made available for kids to discover on their own during quiet time for reading. But I don’t think there’s anything wrong with reading “junk” if that’s what the kid needs to be doing, for whatever reason.

Meanwhile, blogger (and mom) Kristin Tennant likened the debate to food. She described the classic literature some kids just don't like as broccoli and the free-choice books as dessert: "I think kids should be eating some vegetables and reading some classic literature...[but] there’s always room for dessert after dinner."

I think, as Kristin suggests, the answer lies in the balance. Classic literature is important, partly because it's classic for a reason, but also because so many contemporary authors use those stories as inspiration. Twilight probably won't show up on any required reading lists any time soon, but Meyer did draw from Jane Austen and Shakespeare when writing her books.

Faithful readers of this blog know how much I love Pride and Prejudice. But when it was first assigned to me, as a sophomore in high school, I hated it. I barely finished the book at all and eventually succumbed to the charms of Cliff's Notes. The book was required reading and for whatever reason, I resisted. While I finally overcame my initial prejudice (much like Lizzie Bennett) with that specific book, to this day, I still dislike Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre, both required reading in high school.

However, at the same time, I would constantly read and re-read Shakespeare plays, often ahead of when they were assigned in school. When I was allowed to take charge of my reading, I gravitated towards what I wanted to read, even if it meant alternating between Danielle Steele and the Bard.

I don't think classic literature is going to disappear from schools nor do I think everyone will give up required reading entirely. But there is something to be said for balancing between requirements and choice. Giving students a say in the matter helps them take charge of their own education, a skill they will need in the "real world."

Furthermore, popular and contemporary literature can help bridge the gap and introduce students to classic literature they might have overlooked. Rick Riordan's popular Percy Jackson series, for instance, could stir up an interest in Greek mythology and, eventually, the classic epic poems, "The Odyssey" and "The Illiad."

And when it comes right down to it, if faced with a choice between reading anything at all or not reading, wouldn't we much prefer children and students to read, even if it's something we wouldn't have chosen for them?

[Photo Credit: Getty Images]

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Book News Round-Up

Greetings, bookworms. I hope you're enjoying your Saturday, wherever you happen to be. And I hope you enjoy this week's book news.

  • Someone alert the World Wildlife Foundation! We've got a new endangered species! According to courtroom wizard Jon Grisham, printed books now share the same rank as blue whales, cougars and Banded Hare Wallabys. Grisham made the comment in reference to the pricing wars taking place between discount book sellers and the rise of e-readers like the Kindle. I think Grisham may be jumping the gun a bit. Publishing may be changing, but people are still going to want to read.
  • Social media and wine guru Gary Vaynerchuk embarked on a unique twist on the book signing this week. He traveled to several airport bookstores (you know, the ones you browse through after passing through security, while waiting for your flight) to promote his new book, Crush It! While definitely non-traditional, it was also probably a good idea. His book is a business book and who spends a lot of time in airports? Businessmen!
  • Coming off the heels of his uber-popular Percy Jackson series, Rick Riordan is getting set to publish a new series in the spring. This time, Riordan is tackling Egyptian mythology and, presumably, mummies and curses. Sounds to me like Riordan's been taking tips from Scooby and the gang.
  • Yet another book award nominees list was announced recently. As far as book awards go, the International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award is a bit different. It's one of the most global book prizes, since libraries and librarians from around the world can nominate books. The result - a longlist (as opposed to a short list) that's 156 novels long, from 163 libraries in 43 countries. Also interesting to note are the books that come up again and again during the nomination process, thereby proving some things truly are universal.
  • In the U.K. the latest adaptation of Jane Austen's Emma has already aired (while I, regrettably, must wait until January to watch it on PBS/Masterpiece Classic) and has given Telegraph columnist - and self-admitted pedant - Charles Moore an abundant amount of material to work with. Apparently, mistakes abound in the new miniseries, making it less authentic Austen and more of a 21st century attempt to not botch Austen too much. I'll reserve my judgment until I actually see the series, but if it's even only slightly better than the abomination that was the Gwyneth Paltrow adaptation, I'll call it a win.
  • The never-ending list of end-of-year "best of" lists continues to grow. Last week, Amazon.com counted down their top 100 of the year and this week, they revealed the top 10. And once again, it seems the editors' picks don't always align with what customers read and buy. However, Hilary Mantel's Tudor-England Booker Prize winning novel Wolf Hall came in at number 3, so now I'm even more excited to read it. (Also, I feel compelled to mention, once again, that 2009 still has 2 months left in it!)
  • Entertainment Weekly has an exclusive book excerpt from the new Twilight spoof (courtesy of the Havard Lampoon writers) Nightlight. The spoof promises to deliver "romance, danger, insufficient parental guardianship, creepy stalker-like behavior and a vampire prom." With promises like that, how can you possibly resist?
  • I would like this tee-shirt. Santa, are you listening?
That's all we've got time for this weekend, bookworms. Be sure to come back next week!

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

A Story Unraveling


Anytime a book employs more than one narrator, the book runs the risk of having too many voices and too many perspectives. It can muddle the narrative and leave the reader feeling exhausted from all the back and forth. But The Weight of Silence, by Heather Gudenkauf, does a better than average job at weaving its mulitple tales together into one compelling novel.

The overarching plot takes place over two long, heart-wrenching days. In the light of the early morning, two families awake to discover their daughters are missing. Callie and Petra are only seven and best friends. When both girls are not in their beds, their small town community jumps into action to find them, with one set of parents fearing the worst and the other gripping tightly to denial, convinced that the girls are just off playing. As the police and FBI start to search, the history of these families, their secrets and the ties that bind them are brought to the surface. Complicating matters further is the fact that Callie doesn't speak - at all. A selective mute, she relies on Petra to speak for her. As time passes and the parents turn more and more frantic, questions linger: where are the girls? Why did they seemingly disappear? And what does Callie's voice have to do with it?

The novel is Gudenkauf's first and she does an excellent job at creating a thrilling, quick-paced and well-developed story. Though a good deal of the narrative involves characters recounting their past, Gudenkauf manages to tie all of the strands together at the end without making it feel forced or contrived. There are five narrators, who take turns telling the story. While the perspective changes depending on who's speaking, there isn't a lot of "he said, she said." Rather, Gudenkauf focuses on how each person is coping with the situation, from Martin's desperation to find his daughter and Antonia's refusal to see the truth about her husband to Callie's helplessness and fear. The image I conjured in my head was one of several balls of yarn unraveling, as each person told his or her story. The more they unraveled, the more tangled with each other they got, until the story came to its conclusion and the unraveled yarn was now a unified knot.

One of the most interesting aspects of the book was the presence of Callie (and the lack of Petra) as a narrator. In life, Callie is silent, her thoughts left to Petra to express. But as the story unfolds, Callie's voice is among the strongest, her perspective one of the most important. In contrast, Petra's story is left untold. Though in life she is voice to both herself and her best friend, she doesn't speak in the book (save for one brief chapter at the beginning). The differences between sound and silence are critical to the book - characters ponder the things left unsaid versus the things everyone knows. And in the end, it will be Callie's ability to find her voice that will change the course of the story.

With the rotating narrators and the additional flashbacks, it was hard at times to focus on the main plotline, the one centered on finding the girls. Every now and then, I'd forget what was going on in the present because the narrator for that chapter was focused on the past. And the ending, while satisfying, doesn't offer some of the answers I was looking for as a reader (though I suppose that might be the whole point). Still, Gudenkauf writes very well and handles sensitive issues (such as abuse and alcoholism) without being maudlin or unrealistic.

I read The Weight of Silence for my monthly book club and I would highly recommend this book for other book clubs as well. There's an abundant amount of material for conversation and the twist of using multiple narrators is a good jumping off point for discussion. Just as each narrator in the book has his or her own perspective, each reader brings his or her own point of view to the story. Read Heather Gudenkauf's book and reach your own conclusion.

[Photo Credit: Google Image Search]

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Book News Round-Up

Happy November, bookworms. If you're not too sick from binging on candy, enjoy this week's book news.

  • 2009 still has two months to go, but that hasn't stopped some people from compiling "best of" lists for the year. Publishers Weekly recently announced it's Top 10 of 2009, with an additional 90 (to round out the Top 100) being announced next week. While it's a good list, the Christian Science Monitor has pointed out one glaring issue: no female authors. Surely, some woman somewhere wrote a great book this year.
  • Meanwhile, Omnivoracious freely admits to jumping the gun with their list of the year's 100 best books. All this week, they've been counting down the list, 100 to 11. The top 10 will be revealed on Monday, with the whole complete list.
  • Fans of vampire romance might want to look out. There's a new trend in the romance sub-genres and it's being called "zombie love." I'm not exactly sure how a zombie romance works, but I'm guessing it might involve eating other humans. Delightful!
  • Speaking of the decline of vampires, an author once closely associated with the undead is now saying that vampires are of the past and angels are the future. Ann Rice is publishing a new series focusing on the heavenly creatures, instead of the blood-sucking fiends. Rice, who reclaimed her Catholic faith in recent years, thinks it's better being on the good guy's side.
  • Young adult books are gaining many fans in the adult world. Books that are being marketed to teens are being snapped up by adults of all ages. Many authors and publishers believe YA literature is going through a so-called renaissance, experiencing a surge in popularity during an otherwise flat economy. I can fully relate - I'm not ashamed to admit that YA books are among my favorites.
  • Lastly, the Inkwell Bookstore Blog has a hilarious comparison between book clubs and church. According to them, there's quite of lot of similarity, including the top reason: both book clubs and church keep promising you an author appearance, but in the end...nope.
Have a good week! Keep reading!

Stumble Upon Toolbar